3  January  2005 
09:20 Pacific Standard Time

Happy New Year.

Apologies in advance for any bugs, since it's a new month and I have to change a few lines of code to make everything work right.

3  January  2005 
09:36 Pacific Standard Time

Okay. Everything seems to be okay.

Yesterday I went to a CD Store and got a bunch of dicount albums ($9 each) since I couldn't bear to pay the retail price of $17 for the CD that I really wanted (Tegan and Sara's So Jealous). Here's what I got:

AC/DC: High Voltage
AC/DC: Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap
Jeff Buckley: Grace
They Might Be Giants: Flood
Various: Blues Masters, Volume 8: Mississippi Delta Blues
Nellie McKay: Get Away From Me

The They Might Be Giants CD is a replacement for my lost copy. I've looked almost everywhere it could be. Since I've purchased a replacement, now it will show up within the week, I predict. That seems to be how it happens. Also, I thought Jeff Buckley was the father, but it turns out Tim Buckley was the father and Jeff was his son. Since they both drowned and both sing sad songs, it can be a bit confusing to remember who's who. Nellie McKay, who I've read about on numerous occassions, turns out to be the mystery singer that I heard when I was sitting in a theatre during intermission at the play Proof, soon to be a movie with Anthony Hopkins and Gwenyth Paltrow. It's about math and fathers and daughters. There was a lot of screaming and yelling and, well, drama.

5  January  2005 
07:13 Pacific Standard Time

On Consciousness and Our Inability to Prove Anything

Warning: This entry contains some philosophy, so skip it if you're too tired to do much thinking.

Last night I read a really cool article in the New York Times where a bunch of scientists were asked the question: What do you believe is true even though you cannot prove it? and although I found several responses interesting, there was one I liked the best, quoted below:

Donald Hoffman
Cognitive scientist, University of California, Irvine; author, "Visual Intelligence"

I believe that consciousness and its contents are all that exists. Space-time, matter and fields never were the fundamental denizens of the universe but have always been, from their beginning, among the humbler contents of consciousness, dependent on it for their very being.

The world of our daily experience - the world of tables, chairs, stars and people, with their attendant shapes, smells, feels and sounds - is a species-specific user interface to a realm far more complex, a realm whose essential character is conscious. It is unlikely that the contents of our interface in any way resemble that realm.

Indeed the usefulness of an interface requires, in general, that they do not. For the point of an interface, such as the Windows interface on a computer, is simplification and ease of use. We click icons because this is quicker and less prone to error than editing megabytes of software or toggling voltages in circuits.

Evolutionary pressures dictate that our species-specific interface, this world of our daily experience, should itself be a radical simplification, selected not for the exhaustive depiction of truth but for the mutable pragmatics of survival.

If this is right, if consciousness is fundamental, then we should not be surprised that, despite centuries of effort by the most brilliant of minds, there is as yet no physicalist theory of consciousness, no theory that explains how mindless matter or energy or fields could be, or cause, conscious experience.

That really made me think about David Hume, the dead Scottish philosopher I studied years ago. This quote is from An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding:

Suppose a person, though endowed with the strongest faculties of reason and reflection, to be brought on a sudden into this world; he would, indeed, immediately observe a continual succession of objects, and one event following another; but he would not be able to discover anything farther. He would not, at first, by any reasoning, be able to reach the idea of cause and effect; since the particular powers, by which all natural operations are performed, never appear to the senses; nor is it reasonable to conclude, merely because one event, in one instance, precedes another, that therefore the one is the cause, the other the effect. Their conjunction may be arbitrary and casual. There may be no reason to infer the existence of one from the appearance of the other. And in a word, such a person, without more experience, could never employ his conjecture or reasoning concerning any matter of fact, or be assured of anything beyond what was immediately present to his memory and senses.

I think they're both saying the same thing, basically. And it's true--you can never know any more than your senses tell you, because that is our only interface with the world, and we could just as easily be insane and living inside of our heads as be sane and functional. But we will never know, and we can never prove anything since our consciousness is a filter through which all information passes. That's the solipsist argument, and it is impossible to disprove.

As an aside, for a really trippy take on consciousness, glance over Julian Jaynes's The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, where Jaynes claims people used to have split minds, and one mind would "speak" to the other, giving orders. He says that's why you read about ancient people talking to the gods, because they knew no difference between their inner voice and gods. And even if you think his argument is full of shit, there are some really interesting bits there about defining what it means to be conscious, since there is so much we do automatically. Example: are you always conscious of which keys you press when you're typing an email? If you think about it too hard, you'll actually make more mistakes. Consciousness seems to be detrimental, there.

On an unrelated note, my laptop has been repaired and returned. I was a bit embarrassed about fucking up part of the case with my Dremmel (sp?) tool when I was trying to take off the chippy paint, but the parts that I mauled have been replaced! And the motherboard and processor have been replaced. Apple's customer service really does kick ass. Now I can forgive them for not fixing it right when I sent my laptop in for repair the first time, a few months ago.

7  January  2005 
10:50 Pacific Standard Time

Let me begin by saying I don't like the Jeff Buckley CD. Not horrible, but nothing I want to listen to. Reminds me of all the meandering Austin rock I heard in my University of Texas years.

What irony that the Live Music Capital of the World has so few decent rock bands. I like the Butthole Surfers, and they put on a great show when I saw them. (At Libery Lunch, circa 1997, before the city of Austin took away Liberty Lunch's lease and threw them out in the cold. Or hot. Whatever.) A lot of people like the band Spoon, but I haven't heard enough to make a decision. Other than that, well, stick to the more folksy musicians like Alejandro Escovedo or Trish Hinojosa. Or the Asylum Street Spankers.

I'm happy enough with the other CDs. The old AC/DC CDs sound very bluesy to me. I would never call it heavy metal, but perhaps that's just me. Sepultura would be a good example of what I consider heavy metal. The Nellie McKay CD is pretty good, but a little hit-and-miss. What can I expect from a debut album from such a young person? Not perfection, certainly.

Yesterday I was cleaning up this site a bit (rearranging files and such) when I noticed that I have a directory I totally forgot about with pictures of food. I'm hoping to post some recipes for my favorite foods. Right now, I have pictures of Thai green curry (specifically Kiao-Wan, Keow-Wan, however you want to spell it) and endive stamppot (a Dutch meal with endive, bacon, and potatoes--very tasty). In the meantime, until I actually write theses recipes, check out my photo of all the cans of vegetables and coconut milk I used. Yum.

At work there is a newspaper mutilator. The receptionists furnish the lunchroom with fresh copies of the Portland Oregonian and the Eugene Register Guard, but over the past week someone has been stealing the comics pages of both motherfucking newspapers. I think it's the crosswords they're after. Not much is as frustrating to me as a crossword puzzle. Especially because you have to suspend logic to figure out what the clues are actually asking. Reminds me of an old riddle:
You are stuck in a room with only a bed and a calendar. How do you survive?
Answer: drink water from the springs in the bed and eat the dates from the calendar.

Anyway, I think the fact that the comics (the only part of the newspaper that I read, in general) are being stolen or destroyed in order for someone to do the retarded crossword puzzle is what really makes the theft so bad. It would be like someone stealing your wallet so they could wipe their ass with your dollar bills. At least I can always read Get Fuzzy online.

I believe I've gone and made myself all worked-up. I'm going to go read the comics, assuming some asshole hasn't taken or mutilated them today.

7  January  2005 
15:22 Pacific Standard Time

In case anyone was wondering, when I went to read the comics someone had again ripped out the crossword puzzle. At least they left the comics.

A coworker told me about a fucked up movie called The Piano Teacher about a concert pianist who is so devoted to perfecting her music that she neglects her social skills and spirals into a more and more perverse state. But as Lamar Burton would say on Reading Rainbow, "You don't have to take my word for it."

(found on the Internet Movie Database, posted by James McNally from Toronto)

Isabelle Huppert won a well-deserved Best Actress award at Cannes for her portrayal of a woman who, in her efforts to attain the artistic ideal, loses her humanity. Trapped by her talent, she suppresses her emotions and her sexuality until they can only be expressed in twisted and terrifying ways. When a younger student falls in love with her, our hopes rise, but are soon dashed by the realization that she cannot experience love the way others can. It is too late for her, and the film's final 30 harrowing minutes are, tellingly, devoid of the beautiful music that carried the first 90 minutes. The message seems to be that the music itself is not enough without the life and beauty it's describing.

I think this guy makes the film sounds a lot more interesting than the other reviews, that make it sound like a really, really bad S and M porno. In any case, hearing about this movie reminded me of a couple other foreign films that people have described as "most disturbing movie ever made." One was Irreversible by Gaspar Noe. Before making Irreversible, he previously held the record for "most disturbing film" for I Stand Alone, or in French Seul contre tous about an unemployed butcher. I should note that I haven't seen either of these films. I know I Stand Alone has an on-screen warning so that the faint-of-heart can leave the theatre for one particularly gruesome scene. Nekromantic was probably the most disturbing film that I have personally seen, and I can't say I recommend it. Even though I read that the brains were made of scrambled eggs, the love scenes with corpses were more than I ever wanted to see.

There was a point to all this. Ah, yes . . . losing one's humanity. See the quote about The Piano Teacher I think that happens to a lot of people because of the stress of our fast-paced world. I think striving for solely material gain actually detracts from one's spiritual gain. Why else is everyone suddenly taking antidepressives? I don't think so many people had mental health problems even as recently as 20 years ago. It's true that there may have been undiagnosed cases, but Jesus! It seems like every third person is taking Prozac. I don't want to be hyperbolic, so I'll try to find the actual numbers later. Unless I am lazy.

10  January  2005 
08:59 Pacific Standard Time

I have no idea how spammers got one of my email addresses, but it may have been potluck. I didn't know that "Bodrell" was a common enough name to be in spammers' dictionaries, but it may be a French name. Why do I think that? Here are some spam headers I got recently:

Bodrell 75% Off All New Software
Bodreaujoenc Popular software at low low prices
Bodref Photoshop, Windows, Office, CHEAPY.

Other names in spam subject lines have been Bodreax, Bodreau, etc. The really funny part for me is that all these ads are for Windows software, while I now use a Mac at home. I guess that isn't any more funny than a woman whose inbox is cluttered with Viagra ads.

In other news, I'm planning to offer an email subscription so those who are interested don't need to visit the site, or even use a computer (if they have cell phone email). I'm also looking into making RSS feeds, but I know I would be more inclined to subscribe to an email list. Then again, I still don't have a cell phone, and I tend to be a late adopter to new technologies (let others do the beta-testing, please). If anyone is interested in either email subscriptions or RSS, drop me a line (email or comment).

To followup on what I wrote Friday: I saw I [heart] Huckabees this weekend, and one of the characters was played by Isabelle Huppert, the same woman who played the psycho, sexually deviant, sadomasochistic piano teacher in The Piano Teacher. Small world, eh?

11  January  2005 
12:38 Pacific Standard Time

I don't even know if this is going to work, because I changed a bunch of lines in a script, but we'll find out in a second. If it does work, this message will be sent out to a few people on my initial mailing list. let me know if you want to be added to receive emails when I write new entries.

11  January  2005 
13:58 Pacific Standard Time

By the way, although the previous entry only appears once on the main page, it did not go through properly the first time around. All the code I wrote was fine (if you haven't ever written a program before, I suggest you start with Python ), I had misspelled the name of my own domain, contradictator. Duh. Otherwise, the email subscription seems to be working just peachy.

So has anyone out there ever heard this band called Contradictator? They seem to be hardcore metal, but that's about all I know. I thought I had come up with a pretty clever domain name, but as the preacher said in Ecclesiastes 1:9, "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun."

For all you people reading the NIV Bible, you can suck it! The King James version kicks ass! Heheh. But semi-seriously, even though I don't spend much time studying scripture, certain translations just sound dumbed down. Here's a perfect example, Matthew 5:10. First, the King James version:

Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Contrast with this, from Young's Literal Translation (although the Bible in Basic English version is similar, and there are some other translations even more atrocious):

Happy those persecuted for righteousness' sake -- because theirs is the reign of the heavens.

"Blessed" I can understand, because it implies that the people being persecuted will have some other reward for the suffering they have to endure. But "happy?" Pshaw! That's someone taking a few liberties with the translation, methinks. I am not making any statement about the validity of the passage, just the aesthetic value (or lack thereof) of certain translations.

While I'm on the subject of the Bible, and particularly that chapter (Matthew 5), let me address another problematic passage, Matthew 5:13-16:

13 You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men.
14 You are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden.
15Nor do they light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house.
16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven.

Evangelical Christians always try to use that passage to justify their evangelizing. Well, I'm here to say that nothing justifies evangelizing, if you truly consider yourself a Christian. For starters, Jesus wanted his disciples to work on converting all the Jews to the New Deal before even thinking about going to the gentiles with his message. I leave you with another verse from Matthew, that I wish Christians would fucking listen to more often. Matthew 6:5-6:

5 And when you pray, you shall not be like the hypocrites. For they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward.
6 But you, when you pray, go into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly.

17  January  2005 
16:16 Pacific Standard Time

Today I have been playing a couple of albums from the earlier days of my CD collecting. One is by Raymond Scott, who is one of my favorite jazz musicians, even though he's relatively obscure compared to Miles Davis, John Coltrane, and all those other cats. While other jazz band leaders were okay with improvisation, Raymond Scott meticulously composed each piece, and REQUIRED his musicians to be able to reproduce them without improvisation. I heard about all this on NPR several years ago. The album I'm listening to is called The Music of Raymond Scott: Reckless Nights and Turkish Twilights and contains what it probably the most famous jazz song of all time, Powerhouse (you've heard it in dozens, if not hundreds, of cartoons). The names of tracks on the album are hilarious:

Powerhouse,
The Toy Trumpet,
Tobacco Auctioneer,
New Year's Eve In A Haunted House,
Manhattan Minuet,
Dinner Music For A Pack Of Hungry Cannibals,
Reckless Night On Board An Ocean Liner,
Moment Musical,
Twilight In Turkey,
The Penguin,
Oil Gusher,
In A 18th Century Drawing Room,
The Girl At The Typewriter,
Siberian Sleighride,
At An Arabian House Party,
Boy Scout In Switzerland,
Bumpy Weather Over Newark,
Minuet In Jazz,
War Dance For Wooden Indians,
The Quintet Plays Carmen,
Huckleberry Duck,
Peter Tambourine,
Egyptian Barn Dance (Rehearsal),

Another album I listened to this morning was the debut by the UK's Elastica. They came out with this kick-ass album back in 1995, and I never heard anything about them again. As a band, at least. I did hear about Elastica's singer, Justine Frischmann, dating the lead singer from Blur and also getting hooked on heroin, but this is not London and I don't often read The Sun, so that's all I heard. I did about a minute's research and found more in an interview with Ms. Frischmann in the Guardian Observer. You can find the whole article here

. . .

She still grows uncomfortable when discussing this period, and heroin in particular. At one point, she tells me that her parents are Observer readers and she doesn't want them to be confronted with all this stuff again. She has never directly answered questions about her own involvement with the drug, though she has discussed Donna Matthews's very public battle with it, and her own dalliances with other substances. What follows may be drawn from direct experience, or observation. She begins by describing why she considers the topic so dangerous.

"The problem with heroin is that the connotations are so strong that you do tend to generalise. There's a stigma attached to it, which is in some ways irrational."

It's considered evil in a way that most other drugs aren't any more. It's not about recreation. And recreation is OK.

"Well, that's because it does actually remove your spirit. It really does take your life force away. And it takes your fight away."

I can understand why some people would want to take the fight away. Fighting all the time can be exhausting. But then again, being defeated all the time is worse than exhausting, it's enraging. I may envy the wealth of celebrities, but not their public lives. I'm pretty goddamn protective of my privacy. I don't want to be in anyone's database, let alone the cover of a newspaper or magazine. I'd much rather be a famous writer with a pseudonym. Fame for a writer is also on a whole different scale than actor/musician fame. Can you think of any writers besides Stephen King that you would actually recognize on the street? If so, would the rest of the MTV-watching world also recognize that author?

I have more that I could say, but I feel vitriolic today and unless I can focus that vitriol into something worth reading, better to keep it inside. Let's just say that something I was working on missed a deadline because a certain fellow employee didn't finish her fucking part. And she had plenty of time, but she put off the work until the very last goddamn minute. I shall say no more.

20  January  2005 
12:23 Pacific Standard Time

I'd thought I'd already written about this (what follows), but it was in a personal email, not posted to this site. First, from the New Scientist, August 2004:

Hunter-gatherers from the Pirahã tribe, whose language only contains words for the numbers one and two, were unable to reliably tell the difference between four objects placed in a row and five in the same configuration, revealed the study.

Experts agree that the startling result provides the strongest support yet for the controversial hypothesis that the language available to humans defines our thoughts. So-called "linguistic determinism" was first proposed in 1950 but has been hotly debated ever since.

Well, today I read a bit more on the subject. There is a lengthy report in the 15 October 2004 issue of Science magazine. The author is Peter Gordon. You can pester him at pgordon@tc.columbia.edu I'm just going to quote from the article:

Is it possible that there are some concepts that we cannot entertain because of the language we speak? At issue here is the strongest version of Benjamin Lee Whorf's hypothesis that language can determine the nature and content of thought. The strong version of Whorf's hypothesis goes beyond the weaker claim that linguistic structure simply influences the way we think about things in our everyday encounters. For example, recent studies suggest that language might affect how people mentally encode spatial relations, and how they conceive of the nature of individual objects and their material substances. However, none of these studies suggest that linguistic structure prevents us from entertaining the concepts that are available to speakers of alternative linguistic systems.

The article is very interesting but I am not interested in typing up the whole thing, so here is another tidbit, and after that you have to go to a library (Science articles are not free online):

Some cultures use a finite number of body parts to count 20 or 30 body tags. Many cultures use particular body parts like fingers as a recursive base for the count system as in our 10-based system. Finally, there are cultures that base their counting system on a small number between 2 and 4. For example, it is claimed that the Gumulgal South Sea Islanders counted with a recursive binary system: 1, 2, 2'1, 2'2, 2'2'1, and so on.

. . .

The Pirahã counting system consists of the words: "hói" (falling tone = "one") and "hoí" (rising tone = "two"). Larger quantities are designated as "baagi" or "aibai" (= "many").

. . .

I was also interested . . . that there might be taboos associated with counting certain kinds of objects as suggested by Zaslavsky in her studies of African counting systems.

What a bizarre notion! A taboo to count certain kinds of objects. I guess that's not too much weirder than the Islamic prohibition on depicting the human form.

I have another linguistic story to share. Yesterday on NPR I heard an interview with some guy who wrote a book about hard-to-translate words in various languages. There's some cool words on the NPR website. Check it! The book is In Other Words: A Language Lover's Guide to the Most Intriguing Words Around the World by Christopher J. Moore. The link has several sample words, but for brevity I'll just include my two favorites from the list:

Czech

litost [lee-tosht] (noun)

This is an untranslatable emotion that only a Czech person would suffer from, defined by Milan Kundera as "a state of torment created by the sudden sight of one's own misery." Devices for coping with extreme stress, suffering, and change are often special and unique to cultures and born out of the meeting of despair with a keen sense of survival.

The author of the book said that he found this word so amusing that if he were to ever actually feel the emotion of litost then simply thinking of the definition would cheer him up, curing the condition.

Japanese

tatemae [tah-tay-mye] (noun)

A term often translated as "form," but it also has the specific cultural meaning of "the reality that everyone professes to be true, even though they may not privately believe it." For privately held views, the Japanese have a different term, honne, meaning, "the reality that you hold inwardly to be true, even though you would never admit it publicly." The British civil servant muttering the reproach "bad form, old boy" over a drink in the club, may be expressing something very close to the quality of tatamae.

That's all I got. Aren't languages cool?

26  January  2005 
11:49 Pacific Standard Time

This entry was actually a request. It's a reprint of an email conversation. I am much more strict about capitalization and grammer when I write stuff for this website than when I send an email message. Read on.

I had a discussion about legalization with one of my dumbass women friends. She wouldn't even consider any of the possible benefits.

well, some people are close-minded.
and many people have had personal experiences
(i.e., a relative who was hooked on some drug)
that make them incredibly biased.
and it's hard for many people to come to terms
with the facts that their parents either lied to them
or were themselves seriously misinformed about drugs.
i'm sure those idiotic anti-marijuana ads don't help.
like the one where the guy lets a toddler drown
because he's smoking pot while babysitting.
that's pure irresponsibility.
if he had left the house and gone to the movies
while he was supposed to be babysitting,
the end result would be the same.
that's like having an anti-alcohol ad
with someone showing up drunk to their job
as a bus driver and killing everyone on board.
IRRESPONSIBILITY causes these problems,
not one particular pharmacological substance.

I looked around a bit on some of the drug policies. Bush and Cheney were both caught driving drunk.

and bush was a coke-head in college.
not to mention the ties his dad had
with noriega, one of the biggest drug kingpins ever.
before the elder bush got tired of noriega,
he had him on the cia payroll.

and the drug war stuff they do is just retarded. I can't believe how stupid anyone could be to think that the drug war is beneficial to anyone but the czars and the dirty politicians and military shitheads who facilitate it.

they're the same people who started prohibition,
and they didn't learn the lesson from that.
carrie nation and the temperance movement are to blame.
there is big money in illegal drugs,
from the people who sell them to the people
that get money from privatized prisons
to the police departments that use drug confiscation laws
as a means to illegally seize property
and auction it off to pay for new police toys
(tasers, night-vision goggles, etc.)

you should put something on your website to help spread the word. I haven't noticed if you have it already, but it's definitely an issue.

will do.

Also, did yo uknow that the DARE program isn't even federally funded. they get their money by selling wingdings, and getting donations from local venues and shit.

well, i think it's good they aren't federally funded,
since they spread a lot of lies and propaganda.
or, as i hear a lot of people say these days,
"fear, uncertainty, and doubt" (FUD for short).

I think that drug education (effects and history) should be taught as a part of the curriculum in all levels of public school. Science class.

agreed.
including the legal varieties that are often
far more dangerous that some illegal drugs.
ex: oxycontin, alcohol, cigarettes.
nicotine is one of the more toxic substances known.
check it out, from
here

The fatal dose of pure nicotine is approximately 40-60 mg (0.6-1.0 mg/kg, 1-2 drops) i.e. the quantity contained in 2 g of tobacco (equivalent to 2 common blend cigarettes; 15-25 mg of nicotine per cigarette). However, the smoke contains less than 3 mg per cigarette, with smoke of most nonfiltered brands containing 1.2 to 2.4 mg and filtered brands between 0.2 and 1.0 mg.

but that means eating three cigarettes would kill you.
or swallowing a chaw of tobacco.

I can't believe how fucked up this country is.

believe it.
the vast majority of people
only care about bread and circuses.
"give me convenience or give me death!"