05
December
2004
11:00 Pacific Standard Time
Sometimes I get so angry with the simple life they lead
The shepherds smile seems to confirm my fears
They've never questioned anything, They've never disagreed
Sometimes I think they must have wool in their ears
And when you see a cane I see a crook
And when you see a crowd I see a flock
It's sheep we're up against
Sheep we're up against
14
December
2004
07:00AM Pacific Standard Time
The worst part is the smell. It lingered.
Out of nowhere, the smell memory came back the other day
and about turned my stomach.
21
Dec
00:45 Pacific Standard Time
One-two, one-two
If this works like I hope, I'll be writing a lot more frequently.
21
Dec
01:00 Pacific Standard Time
After so much tinkering, and a crash course in web design,
I finally have my web site working (almost) as I want it to. People can submit comments, which are timestamped. I can add an entry via a web form, meaning I can hammer out a thought on a whim, meaning I will probably be writing a lot more crap. I think that's why so many people write about nothing--the barrier is too low. You can just publish everything about your life with a mouse, so why stop and censor yourself? Well, some censoring is good. It's called editing.
AABA
BBCB
CCDC
DDDD
English majors know what kind of verse that would be? Is it something Frost made up?
21
December
2004
13:12 Pacific Standard Time
Yesterday on Fresh Air, there was a "top albums of 2004" feature with rock critic Ken Tucker. I liked a lot of the picks, but one in particular stuck in my mind:
Tegan and Sara's
"So Jealous"
was number 8 on the list.
(WARNING: Tegan and Sara recently fucked up their site by requiring Flash. Enter at your own peril.)
The first thing that struck me was "why the hell don't I know about this album?" since I have two of their other albums. One of them I bought very recently, too. When did this new album come out?
The second thing was that the reviewer mentioned Tegan and Sara were identical twins (which I knew, since I went to see them last year), that they were lesbians (which I did not know), and that they were marketed as such. At the show there were wall-to-wall lesbos. I wondered if Tegan and Sara were also gay or if they just had many lesbian fans (as
Sarah McLachlan does). I even tried to find that out when I got home. No luck. Either I did a bad job searching, or they weren't as vocal about being gay last year.
Gay Bands That Aren't Gay in the Derogatory Sense
Tegan and Sara: I really like the album "If It Was You" in spite of the grammar mistake.
Imperial Teen: I only have the album "Seasick", but I got to see them at SXSW in Austin a couple of years ago, back before they tore down Liberty Lunch. Roddy Bottom, the former keyboardist from Faith No More, sings and writes songs. But it's much more mellow than Faith No More. Their second album has a witty title: "What Is Not To Love" (a statement rather than question).
Belle and Sebastian: If singer/songwriter Stuart Murdoch isn't gay, he's fooled me.
Elton John: Despite eccentricities and several unbearably sappy songs ("Candle in the Wind", both versions), he's brilliant.
Luscious Jackson: Kate Schellenbach, the lesbian drummer, was a member of the Beastie Boys before they did rap (1982). I've actually met her. Many years ago they played at Guilford College in Greensboro, NC, and I got to see them in a very cozy setting (and for only $5).
L7: Is singer Donita Sparks gay? It's so hard to tell with these riot grrrrrrrrls. Sparks is the one who pulled out her tampon and threw it in the audience at the 1992 Reading Festival.
Little Richard: How could I forget Little Richard? So gay that his family kicked him out of the house at a very young age, like 12.
Michael Stipe: Long suspected, recently verified. But I have another prediction that has not been verified: I think he has HIV. There was one awards show where he had what looked like Kaposi's sarcoma on his hand. Coincidence? Lucky for him we now have protease inhibitors.
And that is all I can think of. Submit a comment if I've left anyone out who doesn't suck.
23
December
2004
18:09 Pacific Standard Time
Merriam Webster Online:
diva:
Etymology: Italian, literally, goddess, from Latin, feminine of divus divine, god -- more at DEITY
: PRIMA DONNA
prima donna:
Etymology: Italian, literally, first lady;
a principal female singer in an opera or concert organization
I've heard Britney Spears called a diva.
I've head Beyoncé referred to as a diva.
And Christina (now "Xtina" I believe, just like X-mas), and many other singers that really don't have the experience to be called a diva. But at least all of them are singers. In today's paper, however, I read the following blurb:
While Martha Stewart is away, 12 reality show contestants are going to play.
CBS recently revealed the contestants on "Wickedly Perfect," a domestic showdown hosted by Joan Lunden.
. . .
variety of challenges in entertaining, decorating, cooking, baking, sewing and crafts.
After 10 episodes, the last
diva standing will win a development deal for a lifestyle-oriented TV show, six appearances on CBS' "The Early Show" and a publishing deal.
The nine women and three men include two homemakers, a chef, a baker and a TV host.
So, if I read that correctly, now not only do you not have to be a singer to be a diva, but you don't even have to be female! What the fuck?
23
December
2004
18:53 Pacific Standard Time
Dairy products are a health hazard. They contain no fiber or complex carbohydrates and are laden with saturated fat and cholesterol. They are contaminated with cow's blood and pus and are frequently contaminated with pesticides, hormones, and antibiotics. Dairy products are linked to allergies, constipation, obesity, heart disease, cancer, and other diseases.
24
December
2004
08:48 Pacific Standard Time
29
December
2004
12:03 Pacific Standard Time
I'm glad I don't live in Indonesia right now.
Or Sri Lanka. Or Thailand. Or the Maldives,
wherever they are.
Recently I read about how there is an unstable rock
in the Canary Islands that could cause an awesome
tsunami to smash into the eastern coast of the US.
There's more info at
this site:
Volcano experts say that if a volcano in the Canary Islands were to fall into the Atlantic Ocean, it would send a wall of water, a tsunami, to engulf much of the East Coast of the United States. The Cumbre Vieja volcano on the island of La Palma is unstable and could collapse if it erupted. The 500 billion tons of rock plunging to sea would create a splash more than 2,100 feet high and 25 feet across that would surge across the ocean toward America at 450 mph.
By the time it reached the U.S., the killer wave would be only about 160 feet tall. Even so, it could sweep inland for 12 miles.
In 1998 an underwater earthquake created a tidal wave that killed 2,000 people when it smashed into Papua New Guinea. In 1958, a cliff fell into the ocean at Letuya Bay. The resulting water wall was so strong it removed trees and soil 1,640 feet above sea level.
In the morning of November 1, 1755, a large earthquake struck Lisbon - a great city legendary for its wealth, prosperity and sophistication. It was Sunday and the religious holiday of All Saints. Most of Lisbon's population of 250,000 were praying in six magnificent cathedrals, including the great Basilica de Sao Vincente de Fora. Within minutes, this great thriving city-port of Lisbon, capital of Portugal and of the vast Portuguese empire and seat of learning in Europe, was reduced to rubble by the two major shocks of this great earthquake and the waves of the subsequent catastrophic tsunami. A huge fire completed the destruction of the great city.
One ton of TNT is equivalent to 4.184 x 10^9 Joules.
Multiply that by 200 million . . . gives
8.37 x 10^17 Joules. For comparison, the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki released the equivalent of 15,000
and 20,000 tons of TNT, respectively. The largest bomb detonated by the US, on the Bikini atoll in 1954,
was equivalent to ~15 megatons of TNT.
So Krakatoa's explosion was equivalent to 10,000
Nagasaki bombs. Might as well be infinite,
since numbers that large are outside of my brain's grasp.
29
December
2004
16:00 Pacific Standard Time
30
December
2004
14:31 Pacific Standard Time
If you've ever been a regular customer at a restaurant,
you've probably experienced the trauma of a menu change.
Suddenly, the combo lunch special you always ordered
is gone. If you want the same meal, it'll cost extra.
Because that's usually what menu changes are: price increases.
Well, it's no different with cable companies.
When I was living in Austin, Time Warner Cable
decided they would "make things easier" by
"simplifying the channel lineup," meaning that
the channels were to be divided into categories
and all channels of a particular category were grouped.
All sports channels were in the 500s.
News channels in the 200s. Music channels in the 600s.
And so on. But guess what?
In the process of changing channels,
Time Warner eliminated IFC and Sundance, I think.
They were both channels I consider essential
(in the context of cable packages, but of course
no normal person would think having cable is essential).
Anyway, we ended up paying another $4 a month
just to get those two fucking channels, although
we never changed our plan.
So why is any of this relevant? Well, for starters,
because my household is about to switch from cable to dish,
unless Comcast makes an offer we can't refuse.
But I doubt they will. With the dish network, you can get
60 channels (including local broadcasts), plus a PVR
(a. k. a. Personal Video
Recorder a. k. a. DVR
a. k. a. generic Tivo) for $35 a month.
With Comcast, the monthly cost is ~$45 a month
for the basic package, NOT including the PVR.
There are about 5 channels on the Comcast basic lineup
that are not included in the dish lineup, such as BET
(don't care), Animal Planet (sorta care), FX
(no more King of the Hill marathons), and others.
The other reason I think this discussion is relevant
is because of my employer.
Our time off is a channel lineup or a menu.
Before the merger (over a year ago),
time off was indiscriminate.
A day off was a day off, whether a sick day, or vacation,
or a just-fucking-around day. Now our time off has been
divided into several arbitrary categories.
We have 5 sick days a year, but those roll over
to the next year, so aren't such a nuisance.
I mean, I can always call in sick if I'm not.
Then there are regular vacation days.
Then there are a strange beast called "Floating Holidays,"
which is the subject of my complaint.
We have up to five "Floating Holidays," but sometimes less.
The company may choose to un-float (or fix) one of
the holidays on, say, President's Day. That means
that the company is closed on President's Day, and then
we have one fewer "Floating Holiday" to use.
The catch is that the "Floating Holidays" expire
at the end of the year, and DO NOT roll over to the next.
Even if a fraction of employees forget to take
all of their "Floating Holidays," that's one extra day
of vacation that the company never pays for.
Well, they pay for it, but no vacation is taken.
I'm sure some accountant got a big bonus for contriving
that particular system. I wonder how many extra man-hours
the company gets from this scam . . .
though technically it's more of a trap than a scam,
just like certain credit cards: no problem if you are
smart and pay attention, but miss one payment
and you are fucked. Interest rate skyrockets.
Have a nice New Year, everyone. I'll be back in January.